Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov

Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov flirts with perversity, flaunts literary devices tastefully, evokes admiration and disgust in equal measure, and remains to be an extremely powerful potrayal of human emotion. Much has been said about underlying political metaphor in having Humbert as the european intellectual drifter “romancing” Lolita, his foster American child, and about the morality of the whole saga. With or without refering to these metaphors, the writing retains its charm for the engrossing word play.

There are no graphic details of sexual acts, and this is no easy read for those who consider pornography as literary composition. This is not a two cent sex thriller as sometimes the colloquial references make it seem. This is not about escapades of an old man travelling around the United States with a young nymphet. This is not even like Lady Chatterley’s Lover, which sizzles with the passion of its protagonists. Lolita is about that love, that fire which consumes everyone that comes in contact with it. This is a feverish tale of a seemingly perverted Humbert sinking deeper and deeper into his fascination with nymphets.

The novel is rich in wit and satire, many descriptions of nature or Humbert’s thoughts and feelings are sheer poetry, and the narration is both fascinating and intriguing. Intriguing in capturing an array of ideas and acts that are not only difficult to put on paper, but as history testifies, immediately make the author target of ridicule and condemnation. Like most others, I started reading the book with some prejudices and some precepts. Little did I know that my flight in a plane would show me the outer space: such is the power of the book.

Yes, the book lives at the very edge. Nabokov romances with the baseline. Small errors could have meant the ball landed out of the court, and the game wouldn’t be as exciting as it is now. There is a suspense that thrives on our knowledge of HH’s ideas and motives, and our knowledge that none of the other characters share the information the reader has. There is a sadness that is undercurrent of most love stories. There is a sense of disgust, for the whole idea of a twelve year old being ploughed by an old man is sickening to people of our generation and our education. Like Nabokov points out, till fifty years ago, a girl would start procreating as soon as she hit the teenage. There is an awe imposed on the reader by the way this taut story proceeds, the choice of sentences, dialogue, words reflects why Nabokov’s Lolita occupies such a prominent place in the world literature.

Pray do read it. Read it piecemeal. It is a difficult but fascinating read. Recommended highly for everyone. It does not matter how you perceive Humbert or Lolita or anyone in the novel; you could run into similar characters on the street. Make allowances for HH’s obsession, Lolita’s nature, and then you will see Lolita is like a lotus blooming in the mud of passion and perversity. To pick this flower, you need to wade though the mud, and I believe it will be worth the effort. Reading this novel, like the story it tells, is full of torment. It will test and tease your own thoughts about morality, sexuality, sensuality and love. Like every great book, you will be forced into understanding your own self, as well as everyone around you better. Shocking, but mesmerizing tale. Must read.


Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Lolita

Well said Atra, can’t agree more.

I guess the whole notion of adult as an eighteen year old is to promote the idea that a person should be exposed to atleast high school education; biological growth or historical lifestyle or hormonal activity or sexual desire is not based on what framers of constitution announce as legal. Reading Lolita allows you to understand a lot of stuff that borders on taboo, and explore human desires with unorthodox perspective. Add Lady Chatterley’s Lover to the list, and then I guess Madame Bovary (which I haven’t read yet).

Sensuality as sin is overemphasized.


atrakasya's picture

Nabokov

Apparently, Sting’s “don’t stand so close to me” was inspired by Nabokov’s Lolita.
This is a touchy subject, and from what I have read, lolita has apparently often been the point of entry of most human’s, into the forbidden realm of paedo.
The taboo against paedo is quite recent in human history, actually, and hence the taboo is probably not fully ingrained into the human psyche, yet. To the contrary, even in a country like the us of a, paedo activities continue absolutely unabated, and I may not be fully mistaken if I say that the US laws have not made even an iota of difference to bringing down the levels of paedo in their society.
The average age for the first sexual experience (may be non-penetrative) in the US is really low - early teens, and anyone who is still a virgin in high school is sneered at, by the cool american student crowd. This fact is very publicly declared by movies like American Pie.
Somehow, in the US, sexual experience of a minor with another minor is absolutely encouraged by the social system, and the americans only seem to have a knee-jerk reaction to a minor being coupled with a major. Don’t american morals realize that abuse of a minor by another minor is pretty much in the same league as abuse by a major?
I am not taking a stand here on anything any which way, but am only pointing out the glaring inconsistency inherent in the american approach.
This has always puzzled me - why is the US social system so hypocritical? Why isn’t there a stigma on sexual relations between two minors, there? Its legally forbidden, I am sure, but the social values and peer pressure in the US system makes it almost mandatory that every minor has a sexual experience in high school.
In india, the sexual values of the social system are much more stupidly consistent - we just frown on all kinds of sex!
If you consider the immensely popular japanese hentai, you will find that all the depictions clearly show facial features and proportions of minors. Its almost like the nation is fixated on paedo porn.
Like I said, touchy subject and highly politically incorrect.

And I have always wondered - how come “Lolita” has not been banned internationally, when it stands so boldly at the gateway to the world of paedo?
Maybe I will know when I read it, hm? Smiling